https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892
EpicTux123 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(EpicTux123@proton | |.me) | --- Comment #2 from EpicTux123 <[email protected]> --- Hi Akira, From my testing it seems "google-noto-fonts-all-vf" only installs all Noto fonts with VF variants, no static fonts included. I think you did not understand what I mean. My request is a new meta-package that avoids the duplicates (fonts with both VF and static variants), while prioritizing VF variants, and still ultimately installing the static fonts that also don't have a VF variant equivalent, ending up with all fonts available installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202431892%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
