https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292942
Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|peter...@redhat.com |pnem...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> ---
I realized that when liberation-fonts package updated to follow new packaging
guidelines then as per update, there is no liberation-fonts binary rpm
generated now. The issue we found is in %fontmetapkg macro which does not
provided a way to add Obsoletes:/Provides: tags.
I am getting help from Akira Tagoh to fix fonts-rpm-macros package to provide
that functionality. Once we see that is implemented, we will fix this package.
Meanwhile, broken packages using
BuildRequires: liberation-fonts
should move to use
BuildRequires: liberation-fonts-all
in their SPEC files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292942
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202292942%23c3
--
_______________________________________________
fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
