https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153570
Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> ---
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think rpm-ostree handles obsoletes of an
overlay in this case.
Basically if you overlay a package which gets obsoleted it is your
responsibility to remove it from your deployment first, as far as I know.
So I don't think there is anything that can be done in the google-noto-fonts to
ameliorate this.
google-noto-sans-fonts already obsoletes google-noto-sans-display-fonts:
$ sudo dnf -q list google-noto-sans-fonts
Available Packages
google-noto-sans-fonts.noarch
20201206^1.git0c78c8329-7.fc37 updates
$ sudo dnf -q repoquery --obsoletes google-noto-sans-fonts
google-noto-sans-display-fonts < 20201206^1.git0c78c8329-7.fc37
google-noto-sans-ui-fonts < 20201206^1.git0c78c8329-7.fc37
Also we install google-noto-sans-vf-fonts by default in Silverblue,
so you may not need any overlay at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153570
_______________________________________________
fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
