https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619
--- Comment #31 from Lohan G <loh...@riseup.net> --- (In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #21) > sinhala-test-file.txt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1914858 > is the test file used in the video > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1914859 > > In the video, I install the fedora 36 rpms: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/google-noto-fonts/20201206/9. > fc36/noarch/google-noto-sans-sinhala-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/google-noto-fonts/20201206/9. > fc36/noarch/google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > > > sudo rpm -Uhv google-noto-sans-sinhala-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm > google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf-fonts-20201206-9.fc36.noarch.rpm --nodeps --force > > And this fixes the overlapping in gedit. I followed your steps and downgraded the fonts. It fixed the overlapping issue, temporarily. Then I did a 'dnf update'. After installing those updates I noticed that the overlapping issue has returned. I assume that is because the fonts were replaced again by what is included in Fedora 37? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129619 _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
