https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993670

a3emdot <andre.ma...@gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(p...@redhat.com)



--- Comment #21 from a3emdot <andre.ma...@gmx.de> ---
(In reply to Peng Wu from comment #20)
> Does this issue still happen with Fedora 34 or 35?
> 
> If it still happens, maybe you can report this issue to upstream.
> 
> URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango

I haven't upgraded to Fedora 35 yet. So I do still have Fedora 34.
My Fedora was updated yesterday.
And yes it still segfaults with the script pango-view-segfaults-20210923.sh

We still have
# rpm -q --whatprovides $(which pango-view)
pango-1.48.10-1.fc34.x86_64

The same as in september, so what is your rationale here that the segfault
might have disappeared?

Most of the bugs in the issue tracker of pango upstream
are quite old, do you think there is at least a chance to get this
segfault fixed?

I would like to use pango-view as a tool in a script for diagnosing
font problems, but at the moment the segfaults are really annoying.

Peng Wu, did you even manage to reproduce the segfaults?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993670
_______________________________________________
fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to