https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823984
--- Comment #15 from Nikolaus Waxweiler <madig...@gmail.com> --- I agree that a better written specification would be highly appreciated, but I think you're fighting a losing battle here. OpenType is 40 years of accumulated cruft and vendors and applications doing whatever they want. Our font engineers spend _significant_ amounts of time testing fonts before release in major applications _every single time_. Microsoft, the owner of the specification, is no paragon when it comes to interpreting their own spec in their own applications. As it stands, font metadata is no exact science but fudged in whatever way makes the fonts work as intended for the paying client. It's the reason the spec is so weakly worded. And that's just the way it is. Anyway, this is getting increasingly off-topic. I'd wait for a Qt person to look into this. If they find that the font is doing something off-beat, I can fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
