Alex, I am totally with Erik that on the language level, we can reach this ambitious goal. When building Jangaroo, a lot of effort went into the compiler, and it still is not fully syntactically compatible with AS3 and doesn't do any type checking. Having Falcon and brilliant developers who know it so well to implement the cross-compiler, we can now concentrate on the few remaining challenging aspects. I agree that E4X is probably out of reach, and so is flash_proxy stuff, so e.g. some Flex collection stuff won't be fully supported. Also, I am still not totally sure about IE < 9. To work around the missing getter/setter support would be hard and quite an effort, but after all possible, and it seems we need to support the old IE family to be "enterprise-compatible"... -Frank-
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expression production; JS... Daniel Wasilewski
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expression production; JS... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expression productio... Frank Wienberg
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expression produ... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expression p... Frank Wienberg
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Frank Wienberg
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Alex Harui
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Frank Wienberg
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Frank Wienberg
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Cosma Colanicchia
- Re: [FalconJx] Package down to Expressi... Michael Schmalle