OK, checked in a build.xml that excludes a batik icon. Strangely, on this run, RAT caught packages.dita files in rpc and textlayout. It is too late at night for me to figure out why there were not in the first rat report. Maybe you have a better knowledge of what these files are for. Hopefully you can figure it out. If not, I may not get to look until my Sunday evening.
On 12/22/12 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Justin, > > Rat-check failed with two issues. I'm fixing that now and running rat again > (takes about an hour). I also fixed a minor issue in the README since we're > going to have to re-kit again. > > I'll email again with the all clear when rat is clean and I check in > build.xml. > > While waiting for rat I read the README, LICENSE, NOTICE and RELEASE NOTES. > They all look good, but I did notice the RELEASE_NOTES say that asdoc > doesn't contain TLF. Do you know if that's true? Is the RM supposed to > generate an asdoc package as well? > > I think I have finally covered all criteria I would use to vote. Mustella > passes on 11.1 on Win and Mac. Binaries work. All the text files in the > root look ok to me. Signatures and MD5's matched. > > I think if we fix up RAT we should be good to go. Did your RAT report show > one binary and one unapproved license? > > -Alex > > > On 12/22/12 9:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This is a Apache Flex 4.9.0 release candidate 6. Please see the >> RELEASE_NOTES >> and the README. >> >> Fixed in this release candidate: >> - Fix so that the release build compiles the experimental projects (issue >> with >> empty.properties being removed from binary package) >> >> The release candidate can be found here; >> http://people.apache.org/~jmclean/Apache%20Flex%204.9.0%20Release%20Candidate>> % >> 206/ >> >> Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on >> approving a release?", at: >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> +1 Approve the release >> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or as long as needed given it >> holidays. >> >> The vote passes if there is: >> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >> - More positive votes than negative votes >> >> When voting please indicate what platform and IDE you compiled and tested >> the >> SDK with. >> >> Please put all discussion about this release in a DISCUSSION thread not this >> VOTE thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
