Hi,
I'm about to check in the sources, before, I tried to compile via Ant,
creating the build targets, as I don't know Ant/compc/mxmlc (generaly, I
compile via maven), I'm facing an issue, <s:SolidColorStroke> can't be
resolved as a component implementation, this is my ant target :
<target name="compile" description="Compiles experimental.swc">
<echo message="Compiling frameworks/libs/experimental.swc"/>
<!-- Load the <compc> task. We can't do this at the <project>
level -->
<!-- because targets that run before flexTasks.jar gets built would
fail. -->
<taskdef resource="flexTasks.tasks"
classpath="${FLEX_HOME}/lib/flexTasks.jar"/>
<compc fork="true"
include-classes="ExperimentalClasses"
output="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs/experimental.swc"
resource-bundle-list="${basedir}/bundles.properties">
<jvmarg line="${compc.jvm.args}"/>
<namespace uri="http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns";
manifest="${basedir}/manifest.xml"/>
<include-namespaces>http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns</include-namespaces>
<source-path path-element="${basedir}/src"/>
<library-path />
<external-library-path dir="${env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME}">
<include name="${playerglobal.version}/playerglobal.swc"/>
</external-library-path>
<external-library-path dir="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs">
<include name="framework.swc"/>
<include name="spark.swc"/>
</external-library-path>
<include-file name="experimental.css"
path="${basedir}/defaults.css"/>
<locale/>
<keep-as3-metadata name="SkinPart"/>
<accessible>true</accessible>
<show-deprecation-warnings>false</show-deprecation-warnings>
<warn-no-constructor>false</warn-no-constructor>
</compc>
</target>
Because SolidColorStroke is defined in mx.graphics, I thought may be include
mx/mx.swc as external library path but it didn't work, a help would be very
appreciated.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:29 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
We've been putting them in SVN because we did so at Adobe. I know folks
don't like it, but when the project setup isn't trivial (you need dependent
projects) I think it is helpful. The pain point is you have to hand edit
the file before submitting to make sure it doesn't have absolute paths in
it.
On 12/12/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thank's Nick
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
<webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and
there
are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still
include
them or not, what the policy ?
- Fred
-----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Oups, I missed this message.
Yes, sure, I do that.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Frédéric,
Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
-Alex
On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <flex.programm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
project
PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
Best regards,
Bogdan DINU
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
further
action on this side.
-Alex
On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <flex.programm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA
issue
(improvement) - Flex - 33284<
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.or
g/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
.
Best regards,
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
<webdoubl...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be
away
for
2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
Thank you for your contribution.
- Fred.
-----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
project,
the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a
Robotlegs
alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
definitely interested in donating those components - since I've
brought
them to the community attention in the first place.
Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
Best regards,
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
**wrote:
Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
its
feedback.
Thank's guys.
-----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
How does it happen ?
There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
submitter
had
to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
away,
so
if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
You should also review the code before committing to the code base
and
handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
course,
in
your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
and
address it before committing it.
- Fred.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
Hi,
8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
but
at
this
time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
noticed,
I
wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
what¹s
the
process to integrate them into the SDK ?
Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
was it
work
done for someone else/a company?
IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea
for
significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
ownership
of all of this work.
From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
been
added
to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
namespaces
once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/**
**licenses/icla.txt>
<
http://www.apache.org/**licens
es/icla.txt>
<http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/license
s/icla.txt>
<
http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
icla.txt>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
--
http://www.badu.ro
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
