> > As a workaround, try adding "-locale=" to the compiler options for the > tests that compile the SWCs, with a TODO that it should not be necessary.
That did fix the issue, at least temporarily. I'll add the TODO and a JIRA issue to track this, and go on fixing the rest of errors. Cheers, Chema 2012/12/15 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > While driving home I realized what's probably causing the resource bundle > problems. SDK SWCs like mx.swc get compiled for "no locale" (-locale=) > because they're not supposed to have any resource bundles inside. The > resource bundles go into other resource bundle SWCs like en_US/mx_rb.swc, > which gets compiled for, say, the en_US locale. > > So the problem may be that Falcon is defaulting to the en_US locale rather > than to no locale. As a workaround, try adding "-locale=" to the compiler > options for the tests that compile the SWCs, with a TODO that it should not > be necessary. > > - Gordon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:27 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests > > > > > I'd like to fix these since they shouldn't be hard to fix. > > > Fix them we will, then ;) > > Somehow <compc> is finding either the source code for the bundles on the > > source path, or the compiled code for the bundles on the library path. > > > This may have something to do with "addApplicationParentToSourcePath()" > inside ResourceBundlePath in <compc>... I assume Falcon isn't doing this, > but is it going to? It's easy to modify the compile-config files to get > these, and it does show the dependencies more explicitly. What do you think? > > Cheers, > Chema > > 2012/12/15 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > > > I'm not sure what's going on with the resource bundle issue, but I > > don't think it's an example of Falcon being pickier. Somehow <compc> > > is finding either the source code for the bundles on the source path, > > or the compiled code for the bundles on the library path. > > > > > I see several "duplicated variables" warnings ahead. Do we want to > > > fix > > them or ignore them? > > > > I'd like to fix these since they shouldn't be hard to fix. (The > > problem with fixing the previous problem with Version.as is that Alex > > would kill us if we removed all the includes of Version.as.) > > > > - Gordon > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:05 PM > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests > > > > Also, I've already fixed some warnings, but I'd like to ask before > > going and fix some more. We've already set to ignore > > DuplicateQNameInSourcePathProblem. Should we stick to ignore warnings, > > or try and fix them to end up with a cleaner/safer sdk code? > > > > For instance, I see several "duplicated variables" warnings ahead. Do > > we want to fix them or ignore them? > > > > Cheers, > > Chema > > > > 2012/12/15 Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> > > > > > That's usually a configuration problem. Does the -source-path > > > include > > >> bundles/{locale}, and is -locale set to en_US ? > > > > > > > > > You're right, that is the case. I was setting the locale, but the > > > bundles folder is not in the source-path. How's that compc doesn't > > > complain? Is this another place where Falcon is pickier? > > > > > > Take the mx project. Other than its bundles, it uses some from > > > framework, so we need to add both folders to the source-path in > > > compile-config.xml where none was used before. Is this the expected > > > behavior or am I missing something? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chema > > > > > > 2012/12/14 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > > > > > >> That's usually a configuration problem. Does the -source-path > > >> include bundles/{locale}, and is -locale set to en_US ? > > >> > > >> - Gordon > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com] > > >> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 1:23 PM > > >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests > > >> > > >> Right now there's one recurring error when trying to compile almost > > >> every missing swc. > > >> > > >> Error: Unable to resolve resource bundle 'core' > > >> > > > >> > [ResourceBundle("core")] > > >> > > > >> > > >> This happens for several bundles. I've been trying to figure out > > >> the reason, but this is still beyond my reach. It looks like Falcon > > >> never does resolve these dependencies (but I'm not really sure what > > >> I'm looking at here...). Gordon, do you think this is a > > >> configuration problem and have any idea on how this could be > > >> addressed? Or is maybe something missing in Falcon? > > >> > > >> Also, currently we're only checking the compile targets. Should we > > >> also check the bundle ones? > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Chema > > >> > > >> > > >> 2012/12/11 Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> > > >> > > >> > Nice! That fixed other 5 tests for free and made other 2 easy to > fix. > > >> > > > >> > I've committed the changes to the sdk and sdkswctests. We now > > >> > have > > >> > 18 out of 29 tests passing. I'll try to start looking over the > > >> > hard ones over the week. > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Chema > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2012/12/10 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > > >> > > > >> >> > I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport, > > >> >> > framework > > >> >> and mobilecomponents so that they compile properly in falcon. > > >> >> I've enabled those tests and now we have 11 out of 29 working. > > >> >> > > >> >> Nice progress! > > >> >> > > >> >> > Warning: mx.core.Version is defined by multiple files: > > >> >> > > >> >> This is an example where Falcon is pickier but since it's just a > > >> >> warning I don't think we should try to fix it. Let's change the > > >> >> tests to ignore this warning. You should be able to do this by > > >> >> changing the SWC tests to run with the additional command-line > > >> >> argument > > >> -ignore-problems=... . > > >> >> > > >> >> - Gordon > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com] > > >> >> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:20 PM > > >> >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> >> Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi, > > >> >> > > >> >> I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport, > > >> >> framework and mobilecomponents so that they compile properly in > > >> >> falcon. I've enabled those tests and now we have 11 out of 29 > > working. > > >> >> > > >> >> @Gordon One recurrent issue for other projects is > > >> >> > > >> >> Warning: mx.core.Version is defined by multiple files: > > >> >> > /Users/jbalsas/Documents/dev/apache/flex/sdk/branches/develop/ > > >> >> > fr ame wor ks/projects/automation_agent/src/mx/core/Version.as > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Is this something Falcon will take care of, or do we need to > > >> >> figure out anoter way around like in the config files for example? > > >> >> > > >> >> Cheers, > > >> >> Chema > > >> >> > > >> >> 2012/12/7 Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Following with this, I've checked and in CompcTask, an > > >> >> > include-config > > >> >> > (ifSpec) is added with createElem instead of with > > >> >> > createElemAllowAppend. Is there a reason for this? I've > > >> >> > checked and changing it and adding 'append="true"' in the ant > > >> >> > task to the include-file tag does fix this I don't know if > > >> >> > there's something else > > >> >> to take into account though. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > We won't be using it for now, but do you think we should try > > >> >> > to fix this, or at least document it somewhere? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > 2012/12/7 Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> Yes, I already have it and it's working. I've accessed my > > >> >> >> account through ssh to verify it and I've also checked, and I > > >> >> >> have access to the apache commiters repository, but not ours. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> 2012/12/7 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> On 12/7/12 9:22 AM, "Chema Balsas" <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > Oh, that explains it then... and how unfortunate > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > From Gordon's comment, I assumed we were going to stop > > >> >> >>> > including the version.properties file (at least for now). > > >> >> >>> > That was exactly what I was about to commit, but it seems > > >> >> >>> > I still don't have access to the svn repository. > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> Did you get an email asking about what you want your apache > > >> >> >>> id to > > >> be? > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> -- > > >> >> >>> Alex Harui > > >> >> >>> Flex SDK Team > > >> >> >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. > > >> >> >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
