Hi Dan, just to get things straight, I am not working on a different implementation, but discussion with Erik and Mike trying to find the optimal JavaScript output format. In my current experiments, I am trying an approach without the "goog" library, which does not mean you cannot use the Google Closure Compiler to optimize the output. For loading and linking classes, I use RequireJS, which is an implementation of the AMD module format like "goog", but in contrast, it only does that and not a bagful of other things. I think that concentrating on one thing at a time (loading/linking vs. code optimization) helps clarify the approach and minimizes dependencies of design decisions. What Mike builds fits my view on how to generate JS code like a glove. Mike, your latest refactoring makes perfectly sense, we can put the "goog" solution in one subclass and the RequireJS solution in another and compare the results!
Greetings -Frank- On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Wasilewski <devudes...@gmail.com>wrote: > And don't quite understand the status. Is it like we have 3 different > people working on their own/favourite implementation at the same time?
