[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jose Barragan resolved FLEX-33296.
----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: InstalApacheFlex 1.0

Revision #1421004 
[FLEX-33296] Fixed. 
Generator: Fix the groupMetadataId when main directory pom is defining.  
Deployer: Grant has only one execution command for each ProcessBuilder
                
> Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Bug
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLEX-33296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33296
>             Project: Apache Flex
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Installation & Packaging
>    Affects Versions: InstalApacheFlex 1.0
>         Environment: Windows, MacOSX, Linux
>            Reporter: Jose Barragan
>            Assignee: Jose Barragan
>             Fix For: InstalApacheFlex 1.0
>
>
> Mavenizer creates a main directories poms for use in the new scope "import", 
> but the contain of those poms are wrong in reference with the structure 
> position expected.
> SDKGenerator
> The position of i.e.: framework-4.6.0.23201.pom implied this expected GAV:
>       <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId>
>       <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
>       <version>4.6.0.23201</version>
>       <packaging>pom</packaging>
> however the contain of pom file is:
>       <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
>       <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
>       <version>4.6.0.23201</version>
>       <packaging>pom</packaging>
> And it's overwrite when is deployed over remote Nexus.
> SDKDeployer:
> I got a newer error too when I revised the deployment result on Nexus and 
> find another issue too, a lot of artifacts was deployed with a wrong name or 
> in a wrong structure position.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to