Sure, I definitely didn't want to interrupt your current work!
Mike, while you're at Erik's solution, I could work on an updated design of
how the Jangaroo Runtime could look for Falcon, i.e. how it integrates with
Google Closure.

-Frank-


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> >> How do you propose helping "design" the output and possibly integrating
> >> code you have already written?
> >>
> >
> > To get more concrete, why not starting a first iteration trying to get
> > Falcon to generate code in the Jangaroo Runtime "DSL" format, and use the
> > ...
> > When we got the basic language features up and running, we could continue
> > with merging our approach with Erik's Google-Closure-friendly output and
> > see what happens.
>
> I would propose a different route: let's first get FalconJS to produce
> "my" Closure-friendly output, as Mike has already shown he's pretty
> close on that. That will allow me to continue with the development of
> the FlexJS frameworks which Alex started and documented. If that's
> done, I don't mind if that is put in a branch and Mike/Frank work on
> Jangaroo implementation.
>
> This way I think that we get the best of both worlds: I get a branch
> of FalconJS to continue my contribution (which I hate to see go to
> waste, obviously) with and Mike gains experience with the compiler,
> which I'm sure will help a lot when working on the Jangaroo code.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Reply via email to