I got some interesting information from the original FalconJS developer.

He said he is not using Resig's Simple JS Inheritance scheme and is using
Google's base.js instead.  I guess I was led astray by one of the comments
in the source.  I took a look at base.js and don't see the extend() API so
I'm still trying to find out more.  So I will probably totally replace
adobe.js shortly.

Also, he said that base.js melts away to nothing with google closure
compiler in advanced mode.

Also, I'm still trying to understand some information he gave me about BURM
and AST.

-Alex

On 12/5/12 1:54 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

> 
> Quoting Frank Wienberg <fr...@jangaroo.net>:
> 
>>> I hear you Alex, the interest is 110%, the time is another factor. To do
>>> this it would take a lot of time. I'm sure others would join in (I hope),
>>> so it's really just finding the point to try.
>>> 
>>> I know you understand but a project like that is full language and the
>>> ActionScript language has a lot of elements.
>>> 
>>> What I will probably start doing is try to convert some expressions,
>>> statements and class structure off of one file, then eventually put the
>>> blocks together. I think this would give myself more manageable mile posts.
>>> 
>>> I would like to know if there are any others in this list that are
>>> reading, that might have an interest in some prototyping of this idea?
>>> Anyone out there?
>>> 
>>> 
>> If you started a prototype to generate JS straight from the AST, I'd really
>> like to contribute, based on my experience with Jangaroo. I have to
>> negotiate with my employer, though, because I can't really do that in my
>> free time.
>> -Frank-
>> 
> 
> Sounds good to me, when I do this I will put it in my whiteboard. Like
> I said, I think I will just start small and work up. You have years on
> me doing this. :)
> 
> Mike

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to