On 11/28/12 12:01 PM, "Daniel Wasilewski" <devudes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok will try again by changing a subject because you seems to moved away > from original topic, and I don't want to interrupt :) > > So far I have a test to compare very simple model of prototypal > inheritance and proposed module pattern that seems to be out of falconJS > compiler little syntactic sugar. > I have minimised this source a bit, there was few more additional fields > that I guess something is depends on but even striping it out: > > http://jsperf.com/inheritance-yet-another-test/3 > > If you go to the revision 2 of this test, there will be different > comparison. > http://jsperf.com/inheritance-yet-another-test/3 > Speed of accession of those objects. > > However I would like to improve it, because adobe.js implementation > doesn't seems to call super as the classic does. > So it might be not relevant test right now. Does anybody know how to > call super from there? It looks like in adobe.js around line 61 it tests to see if the super class has the function and creates a _super function you can call. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
