The one that Kevin proposed below (jangaroo) and you keep talking about
licensing it :).
Sorry if that wasn't clear but trying follow the wave here.
Dan
On 11/28/2012 6:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 11/28/12 10:35 AM, "Daniel Wasilewski" <devudes...@gmail.com> wrote:
What I have noticed up there as well, this project not only have JS bits
implemented to mimic flash player, but Action Script bits as well with
lots of missing features.
I see the point behind this idea, and the guys were trying to find a
common ground between both platforms. But ended up rewriting code for
both platforms.
I am not sure this is what we need, don't we? I saw potential behind
FalconJS to at least make this heavy lifting on AST level as the common
ground. Otherwise will go back to project I am doing, which is pretty
much jangaroo approach as well, but philosophy and implementation behind
it differ.
I'm not sure what project you are referring to, but at this time, we're at
such an early stage, I would encourage folks to try different angles. I
have mine and am eager to have folks help shape it, but that doesn't mean
other approaches should not be explored.
Dan
On 11/28/2012 6:09 PM, Kevin Newman wrote:
Anyway, a lot of the current popular plan seems to revolve around
doing direct bindings from Flex into JS/DOM objects and not using a
Flash layer at all, so it does seem like it may not be needed. Still,
it seems like an option, and there is useful core items in there, like
BitmapData, etc. that are already implemented.
Maybe the legal overhead outweighs the benefits of an already
completed code base?
Kevin N.
On 11/28/12 12:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I don't think we need it. But if folks want to try, they need to
make sure
it is legally ok with Apache if we do so.
