On 11/24/12 8:53 AM, "Daniel Wasilewski" <devudes...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2 questions: > > 1. Why literal notation for JS output? Is it the only output mode available? I'm a JS newbie. What other output would be more desirable and why? > 2. adobe.extend / adobe.classes? shouldn't be apache? Well, it shouldn't be "adobe", but I'm not sure what we should change it to. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Cyrill Zadra
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Cyrill Zadra
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Cyrill Zadra
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Cyrill Zadra
- Re: FalconJS has landed Michael Schmalle
- Re: FalconJS has landed Daniel Wasilewski
- Re: FalconJS has landed Michael Schmalle
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Daniel Wasilewski
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Erik de Bruin
- Re: FalconJS has landed Daniel Wasilewski
- Re: FalconJS has landed Erik de Bruin
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Erik de Bruin
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui
- Re: FalconJS has landed Erik de Bruin
- Re: FalconJS has landed Alex Harui