Seems to me The same philosophy behind haxenme, isn'it?
Haxenme generates native code and projects for each platform...
El sábado, 17 de noviembre de 2012, Joan Llenas Masó escribió:
> I'm not Alex, but IMHO taking into account that most UI code will have to
> be written natively for each output target and that UI code tends to be the
> main bottleneck in nowdays apps there's no reason to think that this new
> system would output very poor performant code or bytecode.
> Also, for very performance intensive business operations (I guess) we could
> do the same as with UI code and create native versions and execute them
> through narrow interfaced proxies.
> Same philosophy as Randori I'd say.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:51 PM, sébastien Paturel
> <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> > do you also have in mind to use HTML/JS as main output before cross
> > platform achievment (for example using Cordova)?
> > if so, don't you expect very poor performances with this strategy?
> >
> >
> > Le 17/11/2012 17:05, Alex Harui a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 11/17/12 2:47 AM, "Joan Llenas Masó"
> >> <j...@garnetworks.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think I'm able to get your point after watching these slides and
> mixing
> >>> it together with what you mentioned earlier on in another thread.
> >>> So instead of going through direct UI AS3->{MyOutputTargetOfChioce}
> >>> translation we just concentrate our efforts in the business logic code
> >>> translation AS3->{MyOutputTargetOfChioce}.
> >>> The views on the other hand are implemented natively in the language of
> >>> choice, being it AS3, JS or whatever.
> >>> Finally MXML comes to rescue giving us the power of componetization and
> >>> view declaration.
> >>> This way we can implement same set of components for different output
> >>> targets but declare them in the same way.
> >>> FalconJS will take care of the rest.
> >>>
> >>> Am I right? or did I make my own movie...
> >>>
> >> Believe me, my vision and prototype is not completely thought out. I'm
> >> depending on the rest of the community to help steer and create, but I
> >> think
> >> that you have the basic idea that I have in my head.
> >>
> >>> Anyway, I see maaaaany advantages here. Wow, I love it. This is
> actually
> >>> the essence of Flex taken to the next level :)
> >>> Well, I see Haxe fitting here as well. Actually we could plug many
> >>> packaging tools in the FlaconJS "output port".
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
