I will take a look at it and let you know.
thanks Alex!

> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:57:00 -0800
> Subject: Re: TLF2 Background manager
> 
> Well, once you see "tlf_internal" (or mx_internal, for that matter), that
> implies that there isn't official support.
> 
> I'm not the expert in this code, but in a quick grep of it, it looks like
> you can assign a backgroundManager to the textFlow.  IIRC, there is logic
> that chooses which Factory to use for textlines and maybe you want to figure
> out how to control that so it doesn't use TextFlowTextLineFactory and one of
> the other ones that might honor the textFlow's backgroundManager, or maybe
> it is just a bug and the factory should be checking for and using the
> textflow's backgroundManager.
> 
> 
> On 11/14/12 6:40 AM, "Federico Jakimowicz" <polacof...@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I have been trying for quite a while to setup a custom BackgroundManager by
> > specifiying a customFlowComposerClass that extends StandardFlowComposer and
> > provides me with a custom BackgroundManager.I expected that when the 
> > textflow
> > invokes :
> > TextFlow#tlf_internal function getBackgroundManager():BackgroundManager{ if
> > (!_backgroundManager && (flowComposer is
> > StandardFlowComposer))  _backgroundManager = (flowComposer as
> > StandardFlowComposer).createBackgroundManager() return _backgroundManager;}
> > it retrieves my custom backgroundmanager from my custom flowcomposer.
> > However when rendering the text the TextFlowTextLineFactory seems to get 
> > it's
> > own FlowComposer which in turn has it's own configuration and
> > backgroundmanager. ( Check TextFlowTextLineFactory#createTextLinesInternal )
> > I'm really having a nightmare with this. I know I can draw in the background
> > directly and without using the BackgroundManager however since the framework
> > seems to allow the developer to customize it's configuration I really 
> > believe
> > that using the configuration is the real way to go. I think TLF should be 
> > easy
> > to customize and that it was done with that in mind.Does someone has a way 
> > to
> > go through this?
> > Another alternative could be downloading the source of TLF and creating my 
> > own
> > version of the library in one hand that would be an overkill and in the 
> > other
> > hand I don't know how to build the TLF library project (if someone could
> > provide some tutorial on how to do it would be cool too).
> > thanks in advance,
> > Polaco.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> 
> -- 
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> 
                                          

Reply via email to