On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > > On 11/11/12 11:11 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote: > > > Om, > > > > I've been looking through JIRA, and it seems at least a great majority of > > the tickets with patches are either assigned to somebody (and waiting), > or > > have been closed. > > > > Do you have any on your list that you think need to be taken care of? > I'm > > setup now and would be happy to review them and commit them if need be. > I did this search [1]. Not sure everything found actually contains a > patch. > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuer > > y=project+%3D+FLEX+AND+%28summary+%7E+patch+OR+description+%7E+patch+OR+comm > ent+%7E+patch%29+AND+status+in+%28Open%2C+Reopened%29+ORDER+BY+key+DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FLEX+AND+%28summary+%7E+patch+OR+description+%7E+patch+OR+comment+%7E+patch%29+AND+status+in+%28Open%2C+Reopened%29+ORDER+BY+key+DESC> > > I was able to improve on this query by adding an attachment count of between: 1 and 100 in the "Custom Fields" : https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project%20=%20FLEX%20AND%20(summary%20~%20patch%20OR%20description%20~%20patch%20OR%20comment%20~%20patch)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open,%20Reopened)%20AND%20%22Attachment%20count%22%20%3C=%20%22100%22%20AND%20%22Attachment%20count%22%20%3E=%20%221%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC Should we use the "patch" label for an issue to be able to filter these easily? Thanks, Om > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
