Hi,
as far as I understood the Installer, it automatically installs the Flex SDK
and automatically downloads the missing binaries and copies them in the right
position to create a fully functional FDK?
So if you were to simply copy the FDK directory created to another directory
"{sdkroot}/flex/flex-4.8.0.????" would it then work? I guess I should add an
option to simply generate one FDK.
The current version was initially intended for me generating Every available
FDK and then to deploy that somehow. But I do see the use case in which someone
would deploy a single
FDK.
I think I'll try the Installer and have a look at what that creates. Currently
I have to admit that I was so full of work, that I simply used the FDK I built
myself.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Markus Gritsch [mailto:markus_grit...@gmx.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. November 2012 14:07
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33246) Apache Flex Mavenizer needs a
'better' README
Hi Chris,
just let the installer run again - version 1.0.9 - the directory structure the
installer produces is different from the one mavenizer requires.
As your mentioned in your documentation the flex and air sdks have to be in the
same directory. I think it will be possible when there are two different
variables for "sdkSourceDirectoryName" - main function of SDKGenerator - which
directs to flex- and air-sdk in a separate way.
Markus
On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:26 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
> Well If the installer doesn't produce any different structure, I guess it
> should work with an SDK generated by the installer without modification.
> I just added a real README to the Issue ... if you could have a look
> at that eventually it solves all of your problems. If not, please just give
> me Feedback on the problem and I'll get right on to it.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Markus Gritsch [mailto:markus_grit...@gmx.de]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. November 2012 11:31
> An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33246) Apache Flex Mavenizer
> needs a 'better' README
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Just tried the mavenizer - it would be nice when the installer could work
> with the apache flex sdk installer reusing already downloaded flex and air
> sdk - any thoughts?
>
> Markus
>
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Erik de Bruin (JIRA) wrote:
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33246?page=com.atlassian.j
>> i
>> ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=134
>> 9
>> 3869#comment-13493869 ]
>>
>> Erik de Bruin commented on FLEX-33246:
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> I think other users would appreciate the reminder as well... So maybe move
>> the links to the README and add a little context?
>>
>>> Apache Flex Mavenizer needs a 'better' README
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: FLEX-33246
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33246
>>> Project: Apache Flex
>>> Issue Type: Sub-task
>>> Reporter: Erik de Bruin
>>> Labels: flex, mavenizer
>>>
>>> Also, the README can use some work (more step by step, fill in the
>>> blanks) and the download-sources.txt needs some kind of context
>>> (don't know what it's for etc.)
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
