I think we can put that documentation either in a Wiki page, or on the (new) website on it's own page. But putting it in a JIRA (sub) ticket will certainly make sure the information is available and 'safely stored for future generations' ;-)
EdB On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:34 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de < christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > But I still thing that documenting the concepts on the generator would be > good. Writing the initial version oft he generator only took me one or two > days but dealing with all the different demands from other sides especially > from Flexmojos added about 5 times that tot he final version. Documenting > that and attaching that to my "Patch" will certainly help explain why > things are done that way. Without this some times I guess someone looking > at the details oft he generator would certainly think "Why did he to this > that way?". > > Chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 11:43 > An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Where to host the Maven SDK generator? > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Reddin <gred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A software grant would cover all our bases. Bertrand, do you have an > opinion? > > I don't think that's needed for 9 Java classes, 2 textfiles and a maven > pom that Christofer wrote all by himself. > > IMO he can just file an iCLA [1] and attach his patch via a jira issue. > > -Bertrand > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
