> would it make sense if I try to get the mustella compiler run with falcon?
I'll defer to Alex on that. - Gordon -----Original Message----- From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 12:29 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [FALCON] Using Falcon Ok .. I had two errors but till now I could only one reduce to a simple example. So I'll create a JIRA for it. So would it make sense if I try to get the mustella compiler run with falcon? I can work on that. I'm going to figure out how mini_run could be extended to run with falcon and the legacy compiler and let u know. Or are there already ideas out here how this should been solved? Cyrill Am 01.11.2012 um 10:35 schrieb Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: > I don't agree with Alex. Falcon can compile enough MXML to compile a usable > Checkinapp (one of the SDK tests). So I would like to know more about what it > CAN'T compile. > > But bugs will be useful only if they are reduced to their simplest form > without anything extraneous. I don't want to deal with bug reports like "I > tried to compile this app and got 50 errors". > > - Gordon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:44 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FALCON] Using Falcon > > > > > On 10/31/12 6:13 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> At the moment I'm developing a flex app (mxml) with apache flex 4.8.0 >> and flash builder so every day I'll take also the falcon compiler and >> try to build the app with it. So if I get compile errors shall I just >> create JIRA Tasks with an example or does it not make sense at moment? > Falcon is not ready to handle MXML at the moment. I'd rather get it to > compile mustella before we start taking bugs. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >
