Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasing differently than 11.1

I can be wrong but it doesn't seem relative to the version of the Flash Player because whatever the Flash Player version I was using during the tests while compiling with playerglobal 10.3, the number of failures was the same, can it be related to the way the compiler treats the resources ? is it based on a given playerglobal version ?

-----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:15 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime

Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasing differently than 11.1.  We will have to
find a way to compensate in Mustella if we're going to officialy allow
different versions.


On 10/26/12 4:15 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

Well, I am able to reproduce the issue when I run 10.3.  I will have to
verify that these tests are set up properly.


On 10/26/12 11:29 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:




On 10/26/12 10:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Apache Flex is suppose to support Flash Player from 10.3 to 11.1,
Well, actually, we don't know. The official release is only known to work with 11.1. Since then, Justin found that Flex compiles with Player 10.3 and
seemed to work, but now that we've finished validating mustella against
11.1, we can now see what the differences are if you use 10.3.

So, you're the guinea pig...

--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to