Sorry for my bad English, to be a bit more understandable, I should have
said, "even if the Apache Flex SDK has been tested against my company
software from FP 10.2 (yes, Justin, it worked on 10.2) to FP 11.4, it should
be tested anyway with Mustella IMO" (I guess it translates more my thoughts
and it's more understandable but difficult to do in a once :$ ).
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:17 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime
+1 for running Mustella for different supported versions because it's never
been done.
Folks asked today why the apache flex sdk 4.8 wasn't on FP 11.4 and AIR 3.4
whereas the Adobe sdk 4.7 was, my answer was because the parity release and
anyway they could build it against FP 11.4 and AIR 3.4 but it never been
officially tested yet, even if from my tests, that works, so, it should be a
good thing do test it against Mustella IMO.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:47 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime
Hi,
The SDK got modified a while back so that the Flex SDK can be compiled
against any version of the flash player 10.3-11.4. As a first step we should
run the Mustella tests against the Flex SDK compiled for different version
of the flash player and see if there is any issues.
Justin
