Yeah, I can understand, anyway "That was why I was thinking about adding the license information to the poms" is really the maven way to do it.
-----Original Message----- From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:45 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: AW: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 As far as I know Velo had some sort of Agreement (At least he claimed that he had one when we were chatting about this a few years ago). Eventually it was just a situation where it wasn't allowed but was tollerated from Adobe. I wouldn't like to go the same road though ;-) Chris ________________________________________ Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 12:00 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: RE: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 Hi, That's a really a good idea Chris (even if I got a doubt as well of the Adobe willing). However, how was Velo dealing with the Adobe license deploying their SDK ? I guess, it was an implicit Adobe agreement, isn't it ? Fred. -----Original Message----- From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:51 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: AW: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 As far as I understood the thing, Apache can't ship a binary version because it has some deps to stuff which you have to accept a license for. This is one of the reasons Om is working on the installer, to automate this process (Hope I got this right). Even the Apache FDK depends on stuff you can only get from Adobe ... at least stuff like the playerglobal and airglobal. So I don't see a way how everything could be loaded without accepting an Adobe license. That was why I was thinking about adding the license information to the poms and eventually create a maven dependencyResolver that only downloads licensed artifacts if you accept them by adding them to a "we accept these licenses" section to your pom. But this wouldn't prevent users from using the normal resolver to download everything without accepting the license agreement. One option I could think of would be that Adobe could host some repo containing their stuff and have access to that repo restricted by username+password. So you have to create a user in order to access it username+and when creating the user you have to accept the license agreement. I think this would be an acceptable approach for the users, but I doubt that Adobe would be willing to spare the resources for creating such a repo (You would need to develop some lightweight portal for gegisetring, managing your account, accepting the license agreement, ...). Chris ________________________________________ Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [carlos.rov...@gmail.com] im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira [carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 11:26 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 Ok Chris, so the problem is only related to older Adobe sdks. For newer (Apache) this workflow would be ideal, isn't it? 2012/10/16 christofer.d...@c-ware.de <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > Ideally I agree, but then you have the problem, that maven would > download artifacts automatically without you or your companies nexus/artifactory/whatsoever agreeing to Adobes License terms. That's why I think the best solution, currently, would be to generate the FDKs from the SDKs you downloaded from Adobe and hereby agreed to the license terms. > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
