Chris, Since this isn't actually at the ASF yet, why don't we take this off list for the moment. Email me: labriola at acm.org
I will explain the few hurdles I see. I am not particularly fluent with Maven so it may be that you see easy work arounds and that we can get this all up and running easily with Yennick's fixes. Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:02 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: AW: [OT] Current status on Flexunit4? Hi Mike, Glad that you sorted out the confusion about FlexUnit and its versions ... this really had me worried a little now and then :-) Seems you are having the same problem I was having with Flexmojos. Velo as the main contributor also seems to have left the Flex road and I was willing to keep it alive. So I joined that project and took over its development. What exactly do you need help with? My current solution was to upload 4.1.0-flex to my companies repo and to make Flexmojos work with that (Had to do a little refactoring of FM to support parameterized tests, but got it working nicely). Currently the only problem I am having is that I can't push my FM changes back to the main trunk because the dependency to flexunit-4.1.0-flex is hosted nowhere. Would it be possible to simply upload the artifact somewhere publically? Or would there be any problems with this (It seems the 4.0-RC2 was uploaded by Velo into the Sonatype Maven Repo). I didn't want to do this on my own as it's not my software. If you could do that however it would be great and I would be pleased to push my stuff back to trunk. Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net] Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. August 2012 15:40 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: RE: [OT] Current status on Flexunit4? >My second area of uncertainty regarding flexunit (from flexunit.org) is what >the latest version is. The Blog on the page claims to be 4.1 RC2, but the >download page states 4.1 ("stable" without the RC2). >Assuming the flexunit.org project is different from adobes project and that >RC2 has become the final release I was thinking about using >org.flexunit:flexunit:4.1.0:swc as version and would like to have this >published >in a public repo. FlexUnit 4.x is the successor to the FlexUnit .85 version you discussed. FlexUnit 4.1 is the current release (http://www.flexunit.org/?page_id=14) it is slightly different than the RCs before it. FlexUnit 4.2 is the version that will be contributed to Apache Part of the confusion comes from the fact that only the older (RC) versions were submitted to a public repo. A number of people have contributed infrastructure fixes to the project to make it easier to push it to a repo, however, none of them are complete. Part of the issue is that FlexUnit really has two flavors. There is an AS only version and a version with Flex dependencies. This is an unfortunate side effect of trying to marry to Flex, which is light on interfaces and heavy on implementations. At the time that development last stopped, the project was being refactored to handle this differently and hence make it all a little more maven friendly (slated to be version 4.2). That is the version which will be contributed to ASF. Yennick did some excellent work getting us 99.5% to submitting automatically to a Maven repo (https://github.com/SlevinBE/flexunit/commit/d9dc78955ed31e7ed11d390c2c38fb639b2227bc) so, to that end, I am happy to have any help getting things finalized and actually brought over. The reality of the situation is that everyone actively working on FlexUnit has left the Flex community. This means that any work on FlexUnit presently is being done solely by me and between a million other things. That means its slow going so happy to have anyone who wants to help, contribute. Mike
