On 8/27/12 4:14 PM, "Jose Barragan" <jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> 
> I just commit the patch with all changes applied even fix
> MaskEffect_Properties.mxml as you commented me.
> 
> Regards the Assets path rewrite, when I made then load correctly the
> resources, if you look the baseline changes, you may see that issue is older,
> because the original baselines include the "unload resource icon". In fact the
> really error was an extra ../ in the path, I remove "assets/.." for aesthetic.
Yes, I saw a few of those, but most seemed to just add "assets/..".
> 
> mx/effects/Effect/seek works for me, but I suppose that perhaps I'm a little
> blind in this problem, because I'm use MacOSX and a lot of these tests are
> excluded for my platform, perhaps some of them are those that fail to you.
I'm using MacOSX as well.  These tests are not in the excludes files.  Does
SVN report any differences between your baselines and what is in the repo?
> 
> I attempt to maintain the goal of the tests, and I try to follow the procedure
> that you have indicated to Carlos, therefore except for errors, I believe that
> I am following the correct methodology.
I appreciate your effort and patience.  We're all learning how to work
together on getting Mustella to pass in this diverse environment.  We
probably just need to keep plugging away and sharing information to find out
why we are seeing differences.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to