But...if Git wasn't an option now Alex would not be listing it, isn't it?...so If you think Git is the solution, IMHO is you should vote what you think, because, as I said, is a valid option. If GIT ends as the preferred solution (and there's many votes to option 9), we should go with GIT as many other apache projects. Infra *should not* be a problem if we are decided to make it real.
2012/8/14 Michael A. Labriola <labri...@digitalprimates.net> > > >Then if even people like you that would vote for GIT in first instance, > ends voting for the opposite...I think we are not doing us a favor. > > Carlos, > > Just to be clear. I didn't vote for Git in the first place. I said we > should consider it and I still think we should. I voted the way I did as I > also believe that moving forward now and not spending many cycles if Apache > infra is not ready for us is important too. > > I would prefer we use Git. I voted based on the practicality of using it > now. > > Mike > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 <http://www.codeoscopic.com> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
