+1 for Git Interesting Git thread over at the OpenBSD mailinglist as well:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/198461 --Dwayne On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > If you want to support GIt, please vote in the sbiling thread! vote is open > now! :) > > 2012/8/14 jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> > > > I'm comfortable with SVN too but support the move to Git / GitHub because > > it is an environment that makes work like this much more efficient. > People > > can easily fork the project, make a change and get it to a working state. > > Then the main branch can easily patch those changes back in. It is also > an > > active community. There are many people that can join in, see changes and > > discussions. > > > > However, I don't know how much of GitHub's workflow we can integrate into > > an ASF project. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > > > > > Igor, until now (flex < 4.8) I don' t see deep changes in flex core > like > > > the ones people want to perform. Spark and other features were always > > > "additive". > > > > > > SVN works well with such projects. But we target now other kind of > > changes > > > in the core that never was done before in flex. > > > > > > So I would like to know how would you plan to modify a core piece like > > > UIComponent with near 15k code lines while other people make other > > changes > > > without a tool like GIT... > > > > > > > > > > > > El lunes, 13 de agosto de 2012, Igor Costa escribió: > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > "But the real problem for me is that we can't target the changes we > > plan > > > > without a tool like Git. Maybe people that does not know Git does not > > > > understand this, but we were not able to make such deep changes if we > > are > > > > using SVN." > > > > > > > > Flex SDK was built over 4 versions using SVN, Since Flex 3 we > > > open-sourced > > > > SDK. > > > > > > > > The only questionable thing for this entire thread is we must focus > on > > > Flex > > > > project not in Infra. > > > > > > > > SVN or Git whatever, we have to keep focus on Flex evolves, otherwise > > > > community members will lose their interesting on the Apache Flex > > project. > > > > > > > > > > > > To make a final statement we have to open vote and finish up and move > > to > > > > the next episode. Mustella, Falcon, things that are important right > now > > > for > > > > SDK. > > > > > > > > > > > > If SVN worked so well by until know, why make changes on winning > team? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > ---------------------------- > > > > Igor Costa > > > > www.igorcosta.com > > > > www.igorcosta.org > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > > > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > IMHO, and taking into account that I'm only a not-binding vote... > > > > > > > > > > I don't see real arguments against Git and maybe as Omar says > people > > > does > > > > > not want to figth with yet another SCM... > > > > > > > > > > But the real problem for me is that we can't target the changes we > > plan > > > > > without a tool like Git. Maybe people that does not know Git does > not > > > > > understand this, but we were not able to make such deep changes if > we > > > are > > > > > using SVN. > > > > > > > > > > That's the real problem, and that's what we end planing the use of > > > > > Git...this is not a techy discussion. We at work had to change two > > > months > > > > > ago due to hard refactors in our main product, and we changed > because > > > SVN > > > > > was not letting us do such deep changes. > > > > > > > > > > So my vote will go for Git without doubt...if we don't use it, we > > > should > > > > > not be able to change things like UIComponent...hope people that > does > > > not > > > > > want Git understand this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/8/13 Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Carol Frampton < > > cfram...@adobe.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > A clarification question about Git: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would I lose the ability to look at the repro thru the web. I > > make > > > > use > > > > > of > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/trunk/ etc > more > > > > often > > > > > > then > > > > > > > I expected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can browse it through Git HTTP: > > > > http://git.apache.org/flex-site.git/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Or you can view it through GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/flex > > > > > > > > > > > > -omar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > Director de Tecnología > > > > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > > > > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > > > > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > > > > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > > > > Avd. del General Perón, 32 > > > > > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > > > > > 28020 Madrid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > Avd. del General Perón, 32 > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > 28020 Madrid >
