On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > - Unsure how it is decided what from develop/trunk goes into a release. > > IMO this will make releases a lot more work for the release manager and > > less likely someone will want to take on that role. > > > > Doesn't option 4 exacerbate this problem? How can this be a reason to vote > 'for' option 4? >
The way I see it, if there are a bunch of developers working in trunk, and they happen to leave things unfinished or unstable, then somebody has to go through all of that and figure out what is actually ready for a release and what is not. Without a well defined SVN strategy this is going to be a mess that someone will have to clean up. That is my problem with all of the current strategies being discussed, they all sound too "from the hip", so to speak. I would not be as opposed to them if they had clear explanations of how everything is going to happen to get through the development chain. -omar
