On 7/30/12 10 :14AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> I don't think there has been consensus either other than we don't like >>the >> odd/even numbering scheme to represent stable and unstable. >Not sure how this is relevant. > >> I think we want a branch from trunk which is the entire trunk so it is >>easier to >> merge changes back to trunk. >+1 to that. > >However doesn't really answer my question where these components (which >have been reviewed on the list and have full unit tests) should be placed >in the trunk and what namespace they should use. I see that now. I think you might want to adjust your title to something like "What namespace should we use for new components?" because both the namespace and the branch are open questions at this point. Carol
