On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > ...Please make sure you are voting on Release > Candidate 3 not Release Candidate 2.
+1 for the RC3 release, see below for details of what I checked. I haven't tried building, as an incubation mentor I don't care about the technical quality of the release, I'll trust Flex PPMC members to check that. Open questions that do not affect my vote for this first release: 1) I understand Flex requires a number of external dependencies to build, do we have an exact list somewhere to establish that the licenses of all required and optional dependencies are compatible? The requirements are slightly different for required and optional, see http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html 2) I don't think my question about how ./frameworks/projects/flash-integration/FLA/ContentHolder.fla can be proven harmless [1] has been answered. Thanks for preparing the release! -Bertrand [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-flex-dev/201207.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3DaFs6Mv_Cv_28mMH%3DgsNq6YTMYJjyr3oMB7RzGNMTrmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E Here's what I checked: Checked only the *-src-* files, not what's under binaries or docs at http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_3/ MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.tar.gz) = 270918333da65e70e90accb005ede1f7 MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.zip) = 0ad59abd7703fcbfc8a3ad9f51c9bd9e Signatures and digests match, release manager(s) should get their key signed at the next opportunity. The contents of the .zip and .tar.gz archives are identical (with an extra apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src path in the tar.gz file, not a problem). DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE are present, contents look good to me. The rat exclusions in build.xml look ok, rat report attached to FLEX-33132 looks good to me.
