Hi Alex, Since you asked for opinions: we are using maven and flexmojos to build our sources, a 'completely' mavenized build including playerglobal and airglobal swcs and would help a lot.
All the best -- frank Btw, thanks to Christofer for all the work! -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:22 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs? On 6/27/12 10:00 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I think you got me wrong on the company repo thing. > The repo is not public. It's just for usage inside the company. So I don't > think this should be a problem. > It's just something everybody will have to do over and over again. I will check, but I think that even internal company re-deployment requires an agreement from Adobe. What I'm more curious to hear from others on the list is whether this is going to be a hurdle for adoption. If having Adobe publish Maven-friendly stuff is going to make it tons easier, then I will push to make it happen. > > And I was suggesting to volunteer to publish the artifacts for Apache ... so > if they have something new > Apache could offer their services to do it for them, if they want this to > happen. Did you mean "Apache" in the first sentence? I was expecting that part of Apache Flex's release process would eventually include deploying Maven-friendly stuff. > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
