It seems that the new Creative Suite Web Premium followup ships without Catalyst and FlashBuilder ... I think that is a pretty good statement towards how much effort Adobe will be putting into maintaining those tools.
Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2012 21:50 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: Apache Flex structure to be BMS compliant (was Re: Library Versions used in Flex SDK) I think IntelliJ will update quickly since they are "maven-gradle-whatever-bms-oriented". Flash Builder never took into account BMS, but they will update due that technology requeriments....or are you saying that they will abandon Flex development? moreover...are you saying that we must stay with what we have now? so...that's what we can expect for the future of flex? stay with the same problems we ever had during all years? What kind of changes can we expect? only cosmetic changes? Michel, you and Alex were talking about agresive changes in the SDK...i.e: a completely new set of flex components and arqutecture, isn't it?...so changes like that will not obligate Adobe to update Fb in order to make it Apache Flex compliant? 2012/5/24 Michael A. Labriola <labri...@digitalprimates.net> > >I think the tool refactors implied in tools like Fb or Intellij will > >be > of low impact and should not be a problem to stop evolution, since is > re-structure of the sdk to be a more standard piece of software... > maybe I'm talking from a >feeling that this not should be a huge showstopper. > > So, you think Adobe will refactor Flash Builder to make us happy? What > about the thousands of copies in use already that people won't pay to > update and won't work with a refactored sdk? > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 <http://www.codeoscopic.com> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
