Pepe,

This first release will be a feature-parity release to Adobe's 4.6.0.
 There are not any new components that have been added yet.  This is more
to test our systems to make sure we can package a release without breaking
anything.

-Nick

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Pepe <pepe.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Carol
>
> Is there any list in which the added components is specified?
>
>
> thanks
>
> Shigeru Nakagaki
>
>
> 2012/5/4 Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>:
> > Apache Flex 4.8.0 is intended to be a parity release of Adobe Flex 4.6.
> >
> > At http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/ you will find
> >
> >    apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-src.zip
> >    apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-bin.zip
> >
> > and the associated md5 and asc files.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > ***** Please read the README file at the root. *****
> >
> > In order to comply with Apache rules there have been some changes to the
> build procedure.
> > In particular note the list of environment variables which must be set
> in order
> > to build the source.
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > We expect there to be several more release candidates before we get to
> the final
> > release candidate.
> >
> > The known issues are:
> >    - missing automation libraries, fabridge, flash-integration and
> samples
> >    - missing embedded font support (unless font compiled into swf with
> fontswf
> >        obtained elsewhere)
> >    - required Apache files including NOTICE and LICENSE are incomplete
> >    - Flash Builder project files need to be updated again (will be done
> shortly)
> >    - may need to add explicit prompts when downloading certain
> thirdparty resources
> >    - build number is always 0
> >
> > How to Report Issues
> > ---------------------
> >
> > If there are problems with the packaging such as missing files, please
> reply on this list.
> >
> > If there are bugs that were not present in Adobe Flex 4.6 please enter a
> JIRA bug and
> > note the regression.
>

Reply via email to