Yes My impression was that binding was a little verbose, although, it prove to be faster than EmberJS and include the ability to defer data update to the presentation layer to improve the performance.
What I dislike about KO is it feel a little restricted in the way how its coding expecially the "observable" with default data and for some reason, it didn't work the way I expect. I guess it design for Windows developers. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:44 PM, ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com> wrote: > I havent explored Knockout much, but as far as I can tell, it allows you to > only declare two way bindings. > > Angular seems to do much more. It is actually a HTML compiler. It allows > you to create widgets and higher level components as MXML does. You can > check out tab navigator implementation on angular's homepage. I followed > the same principles and wrote my own accordion just for the heck of it. You > can check it out here https://github.com/ganarajpr/accordion > > I am not sure knockout allows you to define something like this. Actually, > I dont know of any JS framework or otherwise that allows you to completely > declare an accordion or a tab navigator component without yourself writing > a single like of JS. With angular, apparently its possible and that is > powerful! > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:42 AM, John Fletcher <fletch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > good summary of such frameworks > > > http://codebrief.com/2012/01/the-top-10-javascript-mvc-frameworks-reviewed/ > > > > El 26 de abril de 2012 09:31, Cosma Colanicchia <cosma...@gmail.com > > >escribió: > > > > > AngularJS is really, really interesting, thanks for the tip. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/4/26 James Ong <yanlile...@gmail.com>: > > > > @Igor, Angular and Knockout are interesting. I been experimenting > > > KnockOut > > > > which is more like Flex declarative syntax, only Angular make code > > > cleaner, > > > > dependency injection and compact than any other libraries I can find. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Sanford Redlich < > siredl...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> A good friend recommended ember.js as the future of rails > > > >> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone, 415-254-7288 > > > >> > > > >> On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:54 PM, "Igor G." <i.gaidai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > If you are interested in this kinda stuff checkout knockout.js > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:48 PM, aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> I am checking it out - looks and feels interesting > > > >> >> ~a~ > > > >> >> www.ayobinitie.com > > > >> >> http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On 25 April 2012 10:50, ganaraj p r <ganara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> Anyone seem the new kid on the block? Its a new JS library which > > > allows > > > >> >> you > > > >> >>> to make HTML work like our Flex MXML. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Its pretty exciting. Imagine writing Flex MXML directly in the > > > browser? > > > >> >> and > > > >> >>> the browser understanding it? This is the closest thing I have > > seen > > > to > > > >> >> Flex > > > >> >>> in the JS world ( I havent checked out Ext JS! ). > > > >> >>> Worth checking it out! > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> http://www.angularjs.org > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> -- > > > >> >>> Regards, > > > >> >>> Ganaraj P R > > > >> >>> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Ganaraj P R >
