Hello
I'm interested in adding a new MXML rule. And ah, why don't we extend the idea?
I mean, At compile time, is it possible to load jar files which
include external MXML rules?
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/4/25 Left Right <olegsivo...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> Is there a bug# for that?
>>
>> I think I did file a bug for it about 2-3 years ago, but I can't promise
> I'll find it. In any way, it was mentioned in another bug that I filed on
> binding constants - which was resoled as "won't fix" or "cannot fix".
> Besides, it's really difficult to create a reproducible example of
> something which is, by definition inconsistent. But I can imagine that you
> create something like:
>
> <foo id="bar" a0="{bar.a1}"
> a1="{bar.a2}" a2="{bar.a3}" a3="{bar.a4}" a4="{bar.a5}" ... an="{bar.an
> +1}" an+1="value"/>
> you will have a better chance to get it.
>
> Best.
>
> Oleg
