On 3/14/2012 8:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Jeffry Houser<jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
... I'm all for following the 'Adobe" convention and using something like this:
http://www.apache.org/flex/mxml
...
Which will never be a valid URL, as Apache Flex won't own that URL space.
It doesn't matter if it's a valid URL. The current namespace URL
aren't. In my experience most namespace URLs aren't.
Don't you think
http://flex.apache.org/ns/mxml
is better?
Or at least something under flex.apache.org that can eventually point
to a document?
I don't think it ever needs to point to a document.
