I agree The main think I love about spark is the lack of css in the skins and the ability to add my own if I want to.
I really would rather all spark default skins had zero CSS in there The idea of a separate set of skins\components that are heavily syllable with CSS is fine, just as long as it's an optional thing. The basic skins should really not have and css styling at all, for me I mean. glenn -----Original Message----- From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net] Sent: 05 March 2012 03:20 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Why Spark? (was Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark components)) I think it's fine to have a rich set of skins that you can use if you want all of those styling attributes. I would hate to penalize every project though. It still seems to me that, like HGroup and VGroup, we can extend all of these classes and put them in a library... perhaps SparkSimple. It's nothing but composed versions of the other classes with a more full featured skin and additional style declarations. To me that would be the way to solve both issue.
