+1 on the DI
________________________________ From: Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012, 17:46 Subject: Re: Why Spark? (was Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark components)) > > > One of the re-occurring discussions on this list has been the desire to > break down components into smaller parts. > > > > The spark architecture goes some way to achieving this. Take scrolling, > if you want it you wrap you group on a Scroller > > and off you go. Same for layouts. In this way spark is far more flexible > and superior to mx along with its skinning model. > > > > Spark is about writing smaller parts that can be put together to make a > whole, instead of each component having all the > > functionality for every scenario baked in. > > > > Tink > > I believe this paradigm is referred to as Aspect Oriented Programming > (AOP), and IMHO, should be the way forward for Flex. > Hmmm, I think the right term would be composition-based design. In most cases dependency injection would be the pattern to use to configure the compositions. Sorry for being a smart-ass by the way... :) Roland
