You know, you're right. I think I was reacting to carol's response to it and thought that the word vaporware was in there but it doesn't seem to be.
I do think that the term vaporwear would have been unprofessional as it would imply an unnecessarily jaded view that they'll never get them done. I think vaporwear is not a neutral or factual term, but an accusation that things won't get done. But I actually don't see it anywhere on the page so I take my comment back. I'd say that objectively the tone seems playful to me, though it might be easy to miss-interpret the "have you seen me's" as taunting, rather than just a fun way to put things. as Gilda Radner would have put it, "Nevermind"! On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Cortlandt Winters <c...@cortwinters.net > >wrote: > > > I think this is a great list but that it should be more courteous and > > professional in tone. > > > I'm happy to edit the page, I don't see where it is being unprofessional. > Can you point out what you would like to see edited or what you take as > negative? Its mostly a list of links and component names. > > -- > Omar Gonzalez > s9tpep...@apache.org > Apache Flex PPMC Member >
