On 3/1/12 3:33 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" <omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I hadn't realized you could do this, so this essentially has the same > effect as moving the class to a new namespace, so I'm fine with that since > it's already working. I'll update the wiki to reflect that. > I think that was a hack of sorts. In order to implement it, we had to leave mx:Space in the framework rsl, and if you did that in the future for something in the mx.swc, it would cause the need for the mx rsl. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Alex Harui
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Om
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Alex Harui
- RE: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Michael A. Labriola
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Jonathan Campos
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Omar Gonzalez
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Jonathan Campos
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Om
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Carol Frampton
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Omar Gonzalez
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Alex Harui
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Ryan Frishberg
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Omar Gonzalez
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Ryan Frishberg
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... David Francis Buhler
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark comp... Alex Harui
- Re: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark components) Cortlandt Winters
- RE: s:Spacer (was Re: Missing Spark components) Michael A. Labriola