>
> Maybe, I am completely off base here, but exactly what is the motivation of
> the spark component set?  Is it the new skinning paradigm, or is it better
> performing versions of existing components or is it a completely different
> set of components that happen to have similar names?  If this is a separate
> conversation, please reply in a new thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>

Personally for me the motivation to create Spark equivalents of some of
these components is the better skinning model. At least, in my opinion, I
much prefer the Spark skinning over MX. This is why I haven't done any MX
apps since Spark came out.

--
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org
Apache Flex PPMC Member

Reply via email to