[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13219584#comment-13219584 ]
Pierangelo Mancusi edited comment on FLEX-20 at 3/1/12 7:16 AM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hi John, fist of all, nice to meet you. let's start the answer: your comment to the issue at Adobe site is wrong, cause it's based on a bad interpretation of the issue. Of course, before i started to work on this, i tested your solution but it was wrong. (i compiled the SDK with your suggestion...btw thanks Justin for your good work ) When the component is created passing nothing to the "value" property, it inherits the property "value=0" from the Range.as class (if you assign a numeber, the component takes it obviously). when we change the value in the component, the TextInput.text is passed to the NumberFormatter.parseNumber(parseString:String) ( see line 796 - NumericStepper.as) This last help method returns NaN and the property lastOperationStatus of NumberFormatter class is set first to "illegalArgumentError" and then to "parseError". Here is the mistake and the question is: When we can insert a "NaN" value in the NumericStepper's TextInput, which accepts only strings rapresenting a number?...never i say. so when NumericStepper's inputValue is NaN, after all possible assignement in that method, i restore the last valid value. that is the fix. Also i 100% agree with you when you say that the comparison at line 791 of the NumericStepper class is rather questionable. Never seen an if like that :) was (Author: pierangelo): Hi John, fist of all, nice to meet you. let's start the answer: your comment to the issue at Adobe site is wrong, cause it's based on a bad interpretation of the issue. Of course, before i started to work on this, i tested your solution but it was wrong. (i compiled the SDK with your suggestion...btw thanks Justin for your good work ) When the component is created passing nothing to the "value" property, it inherits the property "value=0" from the Range.as class (if you assign a numeber, the component takes it obviously). when we change the value in the component, the TextInput.text is passed to the NumberFormatter.parseNumber(parseString:String) ( see line 796 - NumericStepper.as) This last help method return NaN and the property lastOperationStatus of NumberFormatter class is set first to "illegalArgumentError" and then to "parseError". Here is the mistake and the question is: When we can insert a "NaN" value in the NumericStepper's TextInput, which accepts only strings rapresenting a number?...never i say. so when NumericSteppes's inputValue is NaN, after all possible assignement in that method, i restore the last valid value. that is the fix. Also i 100% agree with you when you say that the comparison at line 791 of the NumericStepper class is rather questionable. Never seen an if like that :) > The Max value restriction in Spark NumericStepper doesn't work properly > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLEX-20 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-20 > Project: Apache Flex > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Project Management > Environment: Apache FlexSDK 4.6 - Adobe FlexSDK 4.6 - Adobe FlexSDK > 4.5 > Reporter: Pierangelo Mancusi > Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz > Priority: Minor > Labels: patch > Attachments: NumericStepperPatch.txt > > > original issue: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-31123 > here a summary: > Steps to reproduce: > 1.Launch the browser with Numeric stepper. Set the min value as 10 max value > as 50. Also set default values as 20. > 2.After launching the broswer clear the default value 20 and focus out from > the numeric stepper. It displays "NAN" > 3. Again focus back to the numeric stepper and try to edit 3 digit value > (Eg.777). Then foucs out. It doen't restrict to max value i.e"50" as set > earlier in > step 1. It allows the 3 digit value enetered instead. > > Actual Results: The enetered value will be displayed > > > Expected Results: It should restrict and display the max values as set in > step 1. > > > Workaround (if any): No Work around. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira