On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:30 PM, David Francis Buhler <davidbuh...@gmail.com > wrote:
> I don't believe projects that fall under the ASF banner can make > improvements or updates or references to non-ASF projects. > > I believe TLF is still an Adobe product, even the older version, and I > think, by "Building" TLF's source into a binary, it might become an issue. > > I got a 130 on my LSAT, so Legal will have to chime in here. > > TLF is released under the "Mozilla Public License Version 1.1", which I believe is compatible with Apache's license. I never took an LSAT... so again - Legal needs to confirm if we are good here:-) Om > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Should we hold off fixing > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23? > > > > > > Last I heard, there was no decision on whether Adobe would donate TLF > to > > > ASF. > > > > I don't think the issue is will they donatate it or not. The framework > > currently uses it. The issue is that the build script currently uses an > old > > (and potentially buggy) version of it. > > > > From memory there a memory leak directly related to using OSMF 1.0 in > Flex > > video players. (It's probably in the Adobe bug base somewhere). > > > > I can't see any reason not to try and fix it but perhaps that's just me? > > > > Justin >
