On 2/28/12 10:44 AM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >> My understanding (needs verification) is that we used a tool that matched the >> output of flash.trace.Trace to the debugline opcodes in a SWF and that is the >> code >coverage number. Unless I'm missing something, that is sufficient, >> and the example above would not show 100% coverage. > > Thanks Alex, please verify when you can as this is not my understanding. One > side note, even in the much better case you describe that would still be line > coverage and I would us to improve our technique there over time. I received confirmation. But you are absolutely right that line coverage doesn't prove out boundary or load handling or other conditions. That's one reason why there are still plenty of bugs in the SDK. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Alex Harui
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update David Francis Buhler
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Alex Harui
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Scott Delamater
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Martin Heidegger
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Scott Delamater
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Alex Harui
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Alex Harui
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Omar Gonzalez
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Scott Delamater
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Omar Gonzalez
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Scott Delamater
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Scott Delamater
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- Re: Testing Framework Site Update Roland Zwaga
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola
- RE: Testing Framework Site Update Michael A. Labriola