It is a very valuable discussion to have. I am just not sure if it belongs in the Compiler list.
FWIW - I used XHTML data providers. Having the keyword in <title> for a better initial ranking. BTW - I will be in Vienna next week if you want to grab a beer to discuss? Duane ________________________________________ Überity.com President & COO Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services http://www.uberity.com Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com Twitter | @Uberity @duanechaos On 12-02-27 11:46 AM, "Martin Heidegger" <m...@leichtgewicht.at> wrote: >Hello Duane, > >I used to develop my "all flash" homepages in a way that I represented >all the data structure I accessed as HTML pages. >So I got all indexable content out with regular lists and content first. >Then I started with the Flash Homepage and built it >entirely on the content of the container homepage: Every Data "resource" >that I took I pulled of the same underlying system >including the html code. If I wanted a new "content" I had to add that >service to the html page. Then I looked that the links worked: So If you >browsed down to apage/acontent then it send the browser (with flash) to >a the index page with that url in the background: >mypage.com/#apage/acontent And the page used this as starting point. > >At the end of the day I had all index-able content available as HTML and >all visible content in the Flash. I used same mechanisms >parallel for ajax homepages and it worked out quite well. > >Do you think a discussion about a examples or a development model in >this direction would be reasonable? > >yours >Martin. > > >On 28/02/2012 04:20, Duane Nickull wrote: >> It used to. To understand how the system works, watch this video: >> >> >>http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2009/01/flash-search-engine-optimization. >>ht >> ml >> >> And this video: >> >> >>http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-evangelists-duane-nickull/seo-secrets-tec >>hn >> ology-and-magic-behind-flash/ >> >> >> The second one is more important and it start around the 6 minute mark >> (not sure why Adobe never trimmed it). >> >> I honestly think that after watching these, you will all agree there is >> nothing that belongs on an SDK discussion list WRT SEO. It is simply >>not >> needed. >> >> Duane >> >> ________________________________________ >> >> Überity.com >> President& COO >> Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services >> http://www.uberity.com >> Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com >> Twitter | @Uberity @duanechaos >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12-02-27 10:57 AM, "Omar Gonzalez"<omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Left Right<olegsivo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> ... and white >>>> text on white background with postion: absolute top -1000px has a >>>>better >>>> chance to affect the crawler than that thing does... >>>> >>> That also has a high chance of getting you blacklisted off of search >>> engines. I wouldn't recommend anyone to do this. >>> >>> -- >>> Omar Gonzalez >>> s9tpep...@apache.org >>> Apache Flex PPMC Member >> >> >> >
