On 26/02/2012 03:11, David Francis Buhler wrote:
My own personal preference would be to remove the current themes (both MX
and Spark) from the SDK. This includes the Cobalt theme, Zen theme, etc. I
would stick with the "Wireframe" theme for Spark controls.

Not remove: extract to a public component and theme repository. ;)

In doing so, we remove the obvious visual impression of a "Flex Application", 
and
encourage the use of Flex/AIR apps that look like part of their native
environment (FaceBook, Android, iOS, Windows 8, etc.). Most developers take
short-cuts and use one of the existing themes when building a product for
their client, and unintentionally give the impression of a hodgepodge of
technologies that prevent the impression of product cohesion. Removing the
Cobalt theme, Zen theme, and other themes would discourage this practice of
use-what-i-found.

Many people use a framework because it gives immediate results. I think its an awesome and important place to start from. That being said: the current things you get when you use Flex are rusty. They used to look good some years ago. Time passed and fresh designs are very in need. Also a "button" is and a "datagrid" are nice things. But it wouldn't hurt to have tools for more
custom designs available too.

If companies have designers, they're better off with a tool like Martin
suggests then they are with existing Themes. Moreover, the existing themes
confuse designers (with the MX and Spark namespaces, the inability to
understand each and every style property, or the overwhelming number of
properties available). If companies don't have designers, they're better
off sticking with Wireframe theme until they do.

i think I never thought so strict. But you are right: The properties are overwhelming indeed.

Incidentally, I'd love to see a tool that generates themes from a
user-defined base color, with the palette generation of complimentary,
monochromatic or triad colors, similar to Kuler.
Kuler is nice, somehow I like colorschemedesigner [1] more, but anyways: I like the thought of defining things by "scheme" rather than "concrete". Contrast levels etc. Sure opens some
nice possibilities - worth investigating?

yours
Martin.

[1] http://colorschemedesigner.com/

Reply via email to