>From my current experience, my designers are a lot happier knowing we use flex than HTML5 (currently at least). Mobile/Tablet is a whole different ball game altogether.
Thanks Avinash Y On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:23 PM, jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Flex is also very good for developing non-enterprise applications* > > Yes! It is. I think Flex solves many of the most complicated environments. > Many types of applications can benefit from it. > > *Yet*, *hardly anyone is aware of it..*. > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Haykel BEN JEMIA <hayke...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Flex is also very good for developing non-enterprise applications. In the > > last couple of years I have developed a couple of applications in the > > educational and digital publishing fields, all aimed at non-entreprise > > usage. Flex was perfect for that. > > > > Haykel > > > > > > > > > > On 22 February 2012 10:27, Roland Zwaga <rol...@stackandheap.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I can't decide if that is right or not. As the Pepper API is > described > > as > > > > "cross-platform API for plugins for web browsers," that implies that > > > other > > > > browsers could implement it too. If it is cross-platform though, why > is > > > > Adobe ditching direct support for Flash for Linux only? > > > > > > > > Sadly, it is another nail in the coffin of Flex as a Flash-based > > > > technology, > > > > no matter how one looks at it. > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if that's true, Flex is aiming to be an enterprise > > technology. > > > I must say that > > > in my years of doing enterprise development I have never encountered a > > > company that > > > used Linux desktops for their employees. Its all windows all the way, > > with > > > Apple slowly > > > gaining some ground. > > > But that's just my experience of course... > > > > > > Roland > > > > > >
